One mouse-year equals forty human-years
Mice develop much faster than humans. In the first month of life, a mouse develops 150 times as fast as a human infant (1). Thus, an adult female is sexually mature at 5 weeks of age, whereas humans are not sexually mature until the second decade of life (2). This rapid development correlates with the mouse's lifespan. One mouse year is equivalent to about 40 human years (1, 3).
You'd think that mice can avoid diseases of aging since they only live 2-3 years. Yet even in its first year of life, a 30-gram (1-ounce) mouse starts showing evidence of aging at the cellular level (2). Humans seem to start aging in their early 30s (4).
Mice and humans are very similar in their diseases of aging
In the wild, most mice do not live past 6 months, because of predators, cold, and starvation. In protected environments, mice live 2-3 years (max life span of 4 years - 1). They start showing signs of aging at one and a half years of age. There are a number of similarities between mice and humans:
- Almost 99% of mouse genes resemble the genes from the human genome (3)
- Mice and humans have overlapping aging proteins (4).
- Mice and humans have similar molecular and cellular processes (5)
- Cancers in mice have similar pathology to those in humans (5)
- Aging mice have many of the same diseases of humans (6, 7): Cancer, heart disease, arthritis, chronic kidney disease, cataracts, osteoporosis, and organ atrophy (skin, testes, ovaries, etc).
However, there are differences. Mice seem to age much faster than humans: a 2 year old mouse is equivalent to a 69 year old human (1) and they are pretty old at 24 months of age. Furthermore, mouse cell biochemical rates are faster (leading to their incredibly rapid development growth) (8). Those two factors seem to contribute to a much higher death from cancer in mice (9) - when they live long enough.
Are we predestined to age?
What is interesting about aging in both mice and humans is that aging seems to be already pre-programmed into mice and our cells. Assuming the environment is friendly and nourishing, both species will travel inexorably down the path that has been defined for them: towards an aged and frail body, riddled with disease.
Clearly environmental factors plays a role in healthy aging (10, 11). Unfortunately, though, even with optimal environmental conditions, there is still a trajectory moving mice and men (and women) towards an older phenotype.
Is this true for all animals? This brings us to the next article; do all animals age?
Next article: Aging is not a foregone conclusion
Aging is not a foregone conclusion for all species. There are invertebrates (for example, hydra, corals, quohag clams) that live centuries. Even within mammals, some species are much longer lived than others.
In the next article, I will highlight some fascinating facts regarding animals that live far longer than seems logical. And to add an extra wrinkle to this, many of those animals don't exhibit the typical signs of aging, until very late in their lifespan. They seem to live a long, healthy, and young life, and spend very little of that time as an aging creature.
References:
- Hagan C. When are mice considered old? The Jackson laboratory, Blog Post November 07, 2017.
- The Jackson Laboratory. Lifespan as a biomarker.
- Dutta S, Sengupta P. Men and mice: Relating their ages. Life Sci. 2016 May 1;152:244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Oct 24. PMID: 26596563.
- Lehallier B, et al. Undulating changes in human plasma proteome profiles across the lifespan. Nat Med. 2019 Dec;25(12):1843-1850.
- Demetrius L. Aging in mouse and human systems: a comparative study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 May;1067:66-82. doi: 10.1196/annals.1354.010. PMID: 16803972.
- Pettan-Brewer C, Treuting PM. Practical pathology of aging mice. Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis. 2011;1. doi: 10.3402/pba.v1i0.7202. Epub 2011 Jun 1. PMID: 22953032; PMCID: PMC3417704.
- Beck J, Horikawa I, Harris C. Cellular Senescence: Mechanisms, Morphology, and Mouse Models. Veterinary Pathology. 2020;57(6):747-757. doi:10.1177/0300985820943841
- Matsuda M, Hayashi H, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Yoshioka-Kobayashi K, Kageyama R, Yamanaka Y, Ikeya M, Toguchida J, Alev C, Ebisuya M. Species-specific segmentation clock periods are due to differential biochemical reaction speeds. Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1450-1455. doi: 10.1126/science.aba7668. PMID: 32943519.
- Gorbunova V, Bozzella MJ, Seluanov A. Rodents for comparative aging studies: from mice to beavers. Age (Dordr). 2008 Sep;30(2-3):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s11357-008-9053-4. Epub 2008 Jun 25. PMID: 19424861; PMCID: PMC2527635.
- Oblak L, van der Zaag J, Higgins-Chen AT, Levine ME, Boks MP. A systematic review of biological, social and environmental factors associated with epigenetic clock acceleration. Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Aug;69:101348. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101348. Epub 2021 Apr 28. PMID: 33930583.
- Cai Y, Song W, Li J, Jing Y, Liang C, Zhang L, Zhang X, Zhang W, Liu B, An Y, Li J, Tang B, Pei S, Wu X, Liu Y, Zhuang CL, Ying Y, Dou X, Chen Y, Xiao FH, Li D, Yang R, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Li Y, Ma S, Wang S, Song X, Ren J, Zhang L, Wang J, Zhang W, Xie Z, Qu J, Wang J, Xiao Y, Tian Y, Wang G, Hu P, Ye J, Sun Y, Mao Z, Kong QP, Liu Q, Zou W, Tian XL, Xiao ZX, Liu Y, Liu JP, Song M, Han JJ, Liu GH. The landscape of aging. Sci China Life Sci. 2022 Dec;65(12):2354-2454. doi: 10.1007/s11427-022-2161-3. Epub 2022 Sep 2. PMID: 36066811; PMCID: PMC9446657.